"Do what's best for kids" should guide school decisions, not silence teacher concerns about workload, resources, and sustainable support.
By Kim Lester
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teachers, somebody's gotta say this.
"Do what's best for kids" should not end every conversation.
I am for doing what is right for kids. Teachers are too. That is exactly why this phrase can shut down a legitimate concern so quickly.
A teacher says, "We do not have enough time."
We do not have the staff.
This is adding hours of work that will have to be done at home.
And the response is, "But we have to do what's best for kids."
Now the teacher is no longer allowed to question whether the expectation is realistic. She has to defend whether she cares about children.
That is not a fair conversation.
The Problem With How This Phrase Gets Used
I need to name something because I've watched this happen over and over.
"Do what's best for kids" is not actually a bad principle. It should guide school decisions. But somewhere along the way, it became a way to stop dialogue instead of start it.
When a teacher raises a concern about workload, she's not saying she doesn't care about students. She's saying the current plan isn't sustainable. She's saying something has to give. She's being honest about capacity.
But if the response to that honesty is "we have to do what's best for kids," then what you've actually said is: your concern doesn't matter as much as my expectation.
What you've said is: caring about kids means sacrificing yourself.
What you've said is: this conversation is over.
The False Choice
Here's what I think we're missing.
Something can benefit students and still be unreasonable to ask teachers to personally sustain.
Those two things are not opposites. They can both be true.
An intervention program can be beneficial for struggling readers AND require more time than teachers have.
A data protocol can improve student outcomes AND depend on teachers doing it at night because there's no time during the day.
A communication system can strengthen family partnerships AND ask teachers to respond to parents in ways that blur the line between work and personal life.
The benefit to students is real. And the unsustainability for teachers is also real.
But we keep treating these like they're in conflict. Like you have to choose between supporting the kids and protecting yourself. Like caring about one means sacrificing the other.
That's the false choice we've built into this conversation.
What Caring for Teachers Actually Looks Like
If an expectation depends on teachers giving up their planning time, staying late, spending their own money, or carrying even more work home, then the school has not fully supported it.
Teachers have been asked to absorb it.
That's not a partnership. That's passing the problem down the line and calling it commitment.
Real support looks different. It asks: What does this actually require? Do we have the time to do this well? Do we have the staff? Do we have the resources? If the answer to any of those is no, then we need to figure out what changes, not ask teachers to figure it out in the margins of their lives.
Real support recognizes that a teacher who is depleted cannot be her best for students. A teacher who is carrying work home at night is less present for her own family. A teacher who is using her own money to fund classroom needs is making a choice that shouldn't be necessary.
Real support for students means real support for the teachers doing that work.
The Conversation That Actually Matters
While we are talking about doing what is right for kids, we also need to do what is right for the people with boots on the ground supporting those kids every single day.
Teachers are not asking schools to care less about students. They are not asking for lower expectations or less rigor or fewer interventions.
They are asking schools to recognize that caring for teachers is part of caring for students.
They are asking for honesty about what things actually cost. They are asking for choices about what gets prioritized instead of demands that everything happens. They are asking for resources to match expectations instead of their own capacity being stretched to cover the gap.
These are not unreasonable asks.
These are asks that belong in the conversation.
Where You Stand When You Walk Away From This
Doing what is right for kids should guide the conversation. But doing what is right for the teachers responsible for carrying it out must be part of that conversation too.
You are not choosing between students and yourself when you raise a concern about what's being asked of you. You are being honest about sustainability. You are being responsible about capacity. You are recognizing that you cannot pour from an empty cup and pretend that's serving anyone.
A school that cares about kids cares about the teachers doing the work. A principal who wants what's best for students supports the people making that happen. An expectation that depends on teacher sacrifice is an expectation that is not fully supported.
That is not failure. That is honesty.
If this landed somewhere true for you, I want you to know something.
You're not being selfish for raising concerns about workload and resources. You're not choosing yourself over students by naming what's unsustainable. You're being clear about what actually needs to change so this work can be done well and sustainably.
If you want to figure out what stage you're in and what you actually need to protect, the Stage Finder is built exactly for this. It helps you see where you stand and what matters most right now. No judgment. Just clarity about what's yours to hold and what isn't.
https://afterthebells.org/pages/find-my-stage
And if you want to be around teachers who understand this and are building their own protection and sustainability, the ATB Box is where that community lives. A space for teachers figuring out how to stay in this profession without disappearing.
https://afterthebells.org/pages/box
Take care of yourself the way you take care of everyone else.
Kim 🩷🌿